Land Use History
Site Map Comments

Land Use Overview

People have lived in the Colorado Front Range for at least several thousand years (Cassells, 1983). The earliest inhabitants were nomadic hunter-gatherers and there is no evidence that their use of natural resources substantially altered water and sediment yields to rivers, or river pattern and process. The first human activity likely to have substantially affected river systems in the region was beaver trapping. Trappers began working in Colorado in 1811 and many of the beaver populations in the Front Range were largely trapped out by the early 1840s (Wohl, 2001). With the discovery of placer gold near Denver in 1859,  other land uses also began to substantially affect rivers. Placer and lode mining, deforestation, flow regulation, construction of roads and railroads, and tie drives occurred throughout the Front Range from 1860 through the early 1900s. Some of these activities continue, others have not occurred for a century yet continue to affect rivers of the Front Range.

Click a link below to find out more about historical land uses in the Front Range.

Beaver Trapping Mining Flow Regulation Timber Harvest and Tie Drives Roads and Railroads Recreation

Picture of beaver dams creating stepped channel

Beaver dams creating stepped channels

(Photo by E. Wohl.)

Picture of sediment accumulating behind a beaver dam

Sediment accumulation behind a beaver dam.

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Back to Top

Picture of Illinois Gulch in 1860

Illinois Gulch, Central City, CO ca 1860.

(Photograph courtesy of Colorado Historical Society)

Picture of hydraulic mining in 1800s

Hydraulic mining Fairplay, CO late 1800s.

(Photograph courtesy of Colorado Historical Society)

Lode mining required blasting apart bedrock outcrops and then crushing the resulting chunks of rock. In the Front Range crushing was mostly done using stamp mills. Descending pestles, or stamps, powered by water or steam created pulverized rock that was then chemically processed with amalgamation, cyaniding, or chloridizing roasting.

Picture of Gregory Gulch in 1892

Gregory Gulch, Central City mining district, 1892; deforestation accompanied mining as demand for lumber increased dramatically.

(Photograph courtesy of Western History Department, Denver Public Library)

Back to Top

Picture of Larimie Ditch in 1900s

19th century view of the Laramie River Ditch, which diverts water through a mountainside from the Laramie River into the Poudre River.

(Photograph courtesy of Fort Collins Public Library)

picture of contemporary diversion structure

Back to Top

Descriptions of the region from the late 1860s through the 1890s feature phrases such as “a wilderness of stumps” and “wanton destruction of timber.” Trees cut during winter were piled along channels to await snowmelt floods, which were used to float logs downstream to collection booms in cities such as Fort Collins. Often the logs accumulated in a splash dam, which was then dynamited, sending a mass of water and logs downstream (Wroten, 1956).

picture of tie drive in Wyoming 1900s

19th century tie drive, Cheyenne National Forest, Wyoming

(Photograph courtesy of American Heritage Center, University of Wyoming.)

Timber harvest substantially decreased stability of hillslopes, leading to more debris flows and landslides, and excess sediment that filled pools and caused fining of streambed gravels. Removal of riparian forests also decreased the natural recruitment of wood to the channel; instream wood helps to create hydraulic roughness, store sediment, provide food and habitat, and increase diversity and stability of mountain rivers (Richmond and Fausch, 1995). Timber harvest occurred throughout the Front Range during the 19th century, and tie drives took place along the Poudre and Big Thompson Rivers and St. Vrain and Boulder Creeks (Wohl, 2001).

picture of wood in South Fork of Poudre

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Back to Top

Picture of newly completed Georgetown Loop in 1884

1884 photograph of the newly completed Georgetown Loop in Clear Creek

(Photograph by William Henry Jackson, courtesy of the Colorado Historical Society)

Picture of road in Big Thompson Canyon 1940s

Views of the road in lower Big Thompson Canyon circa 1914 (left) and the 1940s (above)

(Photographs courtesy of Fort Collins Public Library)

 

 

Picture of unpaved road in CO Front Range

Contemporary view of erosion along an unpaved road in the Front Range

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Back to top

 

 

picture of rafting on river

Rafting on Poudre River

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Back to Top

Beaver Trapping

Beavers are herbivores that construct dams and canals along rivers with access to aspen or willow trees, perennial flow, channel gradient < 15%, and valley width on the order of 45 m (Allen, 1983). On such streams, beaver populations average 2-3 colonies (6-40 animals) per km of river. Beavers create longitudinal steps along channels by building and maintaining dams of wood and sediment. Water is ponded upstream from the dam, slowing the passage of flood waves, storing sediment and nutrients, and creating germination sites for aquatic and riparian vegetation as the pond gradually fills with sediment (Butler and Malanson, 1995; Gurnell, 1998) . Beaver dams thus increase the habitat diversity and stability of streams and valley bottoms.  Although scientists did not document the effects of early 19th century beaver removal in the rivers of the Colorado Front Range, it is reasonable to assume that: flood peaks became at least slightly shorter in duration, with reduced overbank flooding and groundwater recharge along the valley bottom; bed and bank erosion and sediment mobility increased, possibly leading to preferential filling of pools and sedimentation of spawning gravels along riffles; and rivers became a little less stable and diverse (Naiman et al., 1986). Beavers were trapped along all the rivers of the Front Range during the early 19th century (Wohl, 2001).

Picture of Beaver ponds in Rocky Mountain National Park

Beaver ponds in Rocky Mountain National Park.

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Mining

Mining in the Front Range included placer mining (alluvial placers are pieces of metal ore dispersed through sediments deposited by water or glacial ice) and lode mining (the metal is dispersed in small veins throughout bedrock outcrops). In both cases, miners sought to concentrate the ore. Placer miners used rocker boxes. A rocker box is a wooden crate with a sieve at the bottom and a ridged shoot beneath. Sediment and water are dumped into the crate and the mixture is then rocked. Water is run down a sluice (a long, narrow wooden box with washboard-style grooves) to separate the denser metals from the surrounding rock fragments. In hydraulicking or hydraulic mining, water under pressure is used to break apart valley-bottom sediments. Placer miners also used dredge boats from the end of the 1890s into the 1950s. Buckets on a conveyor belt scoop up channel sediments, which are then run through sluice on the dredge boats, or chemically processed using amalgamation with mercury. Two people operating a rocker box or hydraulic system, using 400-3,000 liters of water, could process 2-4 cubic m of sediment in 10 hours; a dredge boat could process 6,000-6,600 cubic m of sediment in 10 hours (Silva, 1986). Miners commonly worked the valley-bottom sediments down to the bedrock contact and out to the valley margins.

Picture of Dredge boat 1950s

Dredge boat, Fairplay, CO, 1950s.

(Photograph courtesy of Western History Department, Denver Public Library)

Placer mining severely disrupted the coarse-surface layer that helps to stabilize many rivers in the Front Range. This resulted in dramatically increased sediment loads, increased turbidity, loss of pools, and increased lateral movement of channels (Hilmes and Wohl, 1995). The mercury used to process placer metals continues to be a source of toxic contamination in streams a century later.

Aerial view of Clear Creek 1894

Aerial view of Clear Creek east of the mountain front, taken from a balloon in 1894; band of pale gray at center of photo is recently deposited sediment originating from mining upstream in the mountains.

(Photograph courtesy of Colorado Historical Society)

Lode mining resulted in further increases in sediment entering rivers from tailings piles and from newly deforested hillslopes that became more subject to debris flows and landslides. The net effect of both placer and lode mining was to overwhelm the transport capacity of adjacent streams, resulting in sedimentation, loss of habitat diversity, and channel stability. The Clear Creek drainage was the most heavily mined area of the Front Range, but the Boulder Creek drainage, the Middle Fork of the South Platte, and portions of the Poudre River drainage were also affected (Wohl, 2001).

Flow Regulation

Placer miners needed water to work their claims, and some of the earliest water diversions in the Front Range occurred during the early 1860s in association with mining. Water diversion and storage increased rapidly as regional population increased and agricultural communities were established along the eastern base of the Front Range during the 1860s and 1870s. The first dam in the region was the 1869 reservoir on Ralston Creek in the Clear Creek drainage, and the first diversion across the Continental Divide was the 1882 Cameron Pass Ditch (Wohl, 2001). The doctrine of prior appropriation was incorporated into the 1876 Colorado Constitution. At present, none of the major rivers within the Front Range are free-flowing for their entire length within the mountains. North St. Vrain Creek is one of the least regulated; it is not dammed until Buttonrock Reservoir near the base of the mountains.

picture of contemporary diversion

Contemporary diversion structures on the Poudre River (picture to the right and above).

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Flow regulation alters the magnitude and timing of flow. This can alter sediment transport and channel morphology (Ryan, 1997), as well as aquatic and riparian communities (Merritt and Wohl, 2006; McCarthy, 2008). Where flow volume and peak flow magnitude are reduced, channels can become narrower, and aquatic and riparian organisms become less diverse and abundant.

Timber Harvest and Tie Drives

Extensive and intensive timber harvest closely followed mining in the Front Range. Wood was needed for rocker boxes, mine timbers, buildings, firewood, charcoal, and railroad ties. Much of the timber went to form ties for newly built railroads bringing supplies and people to the mining centers and carrying ore down to cities at the base of the mountains.

picture of splash dam in WY

Downstream view to splash dam, Medicine Bow National Forest, Wyoming.

(Photograph courtesy of American Heritage Center, University of Wyoming.)

Channels were modified to facilitate the passage of ties: overbank areas were blocked off and obstructions within the channel were blasted out. The passage of huge masses of logs also acted like a giant scouring brush, altering channel morphology and riparian communities. Although tie drives seldom lasted more than a few years on any river, and more than a century has passed since the last tie drive, Young et al. (1989) found that rivers with tie drives were wider, had less riparian or bank cover for fish, lower habitat diversity, less wood, smaller pools, and less diverse riparian vegetation than otherwise similar channels that had not experienced tie drives.

picture of wood in the NF of Joe Wright Creek

Naturally recruited wood along North Fork Joe Wright Creek in the Poudre River drainage (above) and South Fork Poudre River (right) stores sediment upstream, promotes localized scour of the bed and banks and formation of pools, and provides overhead cover for fish and substrate diversity for aquatic insects.

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Roads and Railroads

The first transcontinental railroad reached Cheyenne, Wyoming in 1867 and a branch connected to Denver in 1870. Other lines soon followed. These lines stimulated development of narrow-gauge lines to the mining centers in the mountains. Railroads needed lumber for ties and charcoal to fuel steam engines, and numerous sawmills were built in the mountains to satisfy this demand (Wohl, 2001).

Roads were built simultaneously with railroads in much of the Front Range during the latter half of the 19th century. Barely cleared tracks gave way to corduroy roads on which logs were laid side by side to reduce the effects of mud and boulders, and then to graded and paved roads. Like railroads, roads can reduce the width of the riparian corridor by occupying part of the valley bottom.

Picture of road in Big Thompson Canyon 1914

Sediment eroded from the road surface or the road embankment, or hillslope instability triggered by compaction associated with the road, also affect adjacent streams. Contaminants and traction sand and gravel carried from roads by runoff enter rivers. Lorch (1998) estimated that traction sand from Interstate 70 introduces 150 times the natural sediment yield to adjacent Black Gore Creek, burying riparian vegetation and filling pools. North St. Vrain Creek is today the only major Front Range river that is not closely paralleled by a road, although parts of other rivers (e.g., upper Big Thompson & upper Poudre Rivers) do not have adjacent roads.

Picture of Boulder Creek with road and old railroad

Contemporary view of Boulder Creek constricted by highway at right and former railroad track now converted to pedestrian and bike path.

(Photo by E. Wohl)

Recreation

Historical recreational effects on rivers of the Front Range were associated mainly with fishing. Trout in particular declined in abundance as a result of the combined effects of intense fishing to supply markets in Denver and in mountain communities, and the channel changes associated with mining, flow regulation, timber harvest and tie drives, and roads and railroads. With the exception of the native greenback cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki stomias) now present only in headwaters with barriers such as waterfalls, all other species of trout present in the Front Range are exotics introduced from elsewhere.

Fishing continues as a contemporary recreational effect on rivers of the Front Range, along with commercial whitewater rafting. Tens of thousands of people now take day trips on the Poudre River each summer, with put-in and take-out at a few spots along the river. These intensively used sites experience soil compaction, bank erosion, and removal of riparian vegetation.