Cultural Energy
Expended in Range Meat and Fiber Production
by C. Wayne Cook
Rangeland Ecosystem
Science
Colostate University
Introduction
Range livestock production requires more cultural energy than commonly
believed. However the cultural energy expended for range meat and fiber
is considerably less than that required in confined fattening procedures.
Complementing rangelands with dryland forages offers great promise in
decreasing the cost of fossil fuel to produce a pound of red meat for
human consumption, compared to feedlot fattening.
Oil and gas in the
United States are finite resources and predictions are that there are
only a 50-year supply of gas and a 75-year supply of oil at the present
rate of usage. It is true that we have several hundred years' supply of
coal and a rather vast energy reserve in oil shale and nuclear material,
but they too are finite and expensive to develop as substitutes for gas
and oil. Therefore the public is becomin g conscious of the use of fossil
fuels, whether it be for pleasure or for the production of food. In the
latter case, a close correlation will develop between the cost of a product
and the expenditure of cultural energy to produce it.
It is of interest to evaluate the cultural energy expended in the production
of food and particularly meat because meat comes from the second feeding
level in the food chain and therefore requires more subsidized energy
in the conversion of solar energy than do plant foods.
Measures
of Cultural Energy
Cultural or subsidized
energy is the energy other than solar energy needed to produce food and
fiber. Cultural energy includes labor, manufacture of machinery, transportation,
tillage, production of fertilizers and herbicides, processing material,
and finally marketing the product .
Calculations of cultural
energy input for labor were 2,500 kcal per hour, for depreciation and
maintenance of large machinery were 45,000 kcal per hour of operation,
gasoline per gallon contains 3 1,056 kcal, transportation requires 4 kcal
perr pound per mile. Electricity was calculated to be about 860 kcal per
kilowatt hour (Table 1). Electricity was calculated as being only 40%
efficient because it requires 2.5 more BTU's of coal to produce the equivalent
kilowatt hours of electricity. This is a result of the loss of energy
in heat when steam is used to produce power to turn the turbines. This
does not include the cultural energy required to mine the coal and transport
it to the generating sites or the loss in transmission lines. In the Central
Plains area it was determined that about 80% of the electricity comes
from steam generators and 20% from hydroelectric sources. Sorghum produced
on summer-fallowed ground for grazing required 495.7 Mcal per acre and
feeds used in supplements and rations varied from 350 to 500 kcal per
pound.
| Table 1. Average cultural energy expended for various range sheep
and cattle operations compared to typical feedlot operations on the
eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains. |
|
|
Intermountain Great Basin
|
Central Great Plains
|
Central Plains
|
|
Range sheep 2,000 female herd1
|
Range cows 250 female herd1
|
Range-sorghum 400 steer operation1
|
Range cows 250 female herd1
|
Range-sorghum 400 steer operation
|
15,000 feedlot operation
|
|
Quanity
|
Mcal
|
Quanity
|
Mcal
|
Quanity
|
Mcal
|
Quanity
|
Mcal
|
Quanity
|
Mcal
|
Quanity
|
Mcal
|
|
Labor (hour)
|
6,080
|
15,200
|
3,170
|
7,925
|
2,737
|
6,842
|
2,737
|
6,842
|
3,780
|
9,450
|
16,320
|
40,800
|
|
Machinery (hour)
|
1,500
|
67,500
|
1,200
|
54,000
|
1,744
|
78,480
|
1,744
|
78,480
|
1,900
|
85,500
|
16,320
|
734,400
|
|
Gasoline (gal)
|
5,166
|
160,435
|
3,500
|
108,696
|
3,959
|
122,951
|
3,959
|
122,951
|
4,500
|
139,752
|
29,070
|
902,798
|
|
Transportation (miles x lb)
|
2,305,000
|
9,200
|
2,380,000
|
9,520
|
27,257
|
109
|
27,257
|
109
|
194,444
|
778
|
2,253*106
|
9,012,000
|
|
Electricity (KW hour)
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
122,559
|
105,400
|
|
Feed (lb)
|
45,000
|
19,350
|
45,000
|
22,500
|
67,500
|
23,490
|
67,500
|
23,490
|
180,000
|
62,640
|
133,875,000
|
59440,500
|
|
Sorghum pasture (acre)
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
109
|
54,035
|
---
|
---
|
171
|
84,769
|
---
|
---
|
|
Total cultural energy (Mcal)
|
|
271,705
|
|
202,641
|
|
285,907
|
|
231,872
|
|
382,889
|
|
70,235,898
|
| 1 These calculations include the expenditures
of cultural energy required to operatethe entire ranching enterprise |
Range
Sheep Production in the Intermountain Great Basin
The sheep ranches
included in the study were typical of many operations in Utah, Nevada,
and southern Idaho, where sheep graze desert ranges during the winter
from about November I until about April 1, after which they are trailed
onto foothill range where they lamb on crested wheatgrass and/or native
grass-sagebrush types. About the middle of June they are moved into mountain
brush types and subsequently into higher mountain zones.
In this study all
lambs were black-face crosses. All cultural energy expenditures were made
on the basis of a 1,800 mature ewe herd with 200 replacements, 36 bucks,
and 3 to 4 horses. From these operations about 70% of the lambs were sold
as grass-fat choice lambs weighing about 90 lb with a 50.9 dressing percentage.
The dressed carcass was 16.2% protein and 23.4% fat. The remaining 30%
of the lambs weighed 75 lb and sold as feeders which dressed 47.5% with
17. 1% protein and 18.8% fat.
All carcass protein was considered to possess 5.7 kcal of gross energy
per gram and all fat was calculated as having 9.4 kcal per gram.
The sheep, while on the desert ranges, were supplemented from December
15 until March 15 at the rate of one-half pound per head every other day.
The supplement consisted of 45% alfalfa, 25% barley, and 30% soybean meal.
The cultural energy in the alfalfa, barley, and soybean meal was 272 kcal,
411 kcal, and 658 kcal per pound of material respectively. The mixture
was fed in pelleted form and was purchased at a feed mill and transported
to the desert range about 48 miles away.
It was calculated that 2.24 kcal of cultural energy was expended for each
kilocalorie in dressed carcass meat and 1.54 Mcal of cultural energy was
used for each pound of live weight of lamb produced (Table 2).
| Table 2. Average output of meat and energy compared to cultural
energy input from various range sheep and cattle ranches and typical
feedlot operations in the western range area. |
|
|
Intermountain Great Basin
|
Central Great Plains
|
Central Plains
|
|
Range sheep 2,000 female herd
|
Range cows 250 female herd
|
Range-sorghum 400 steer operation
|
Range cows 250 female herd
|
Range-sorghum 400 steer operation
|
15,000 feedlot operation
|
|
Market weight or gain (lb)
|
85.51
|
4052
|
4453
|
414
|
396
|
586
|
|
Calf or lamb crop (%)
|
103.5
|
93
|
93
|
92
|
984
|
995
|
|
Total energy in carcass (Mcal)
|
121,382
|
49,498
|
54,423
|
50,578
|
138,138
|
13,186,800
|
|
No. marketed
|
2,070
|
233
|
233
|
230
|
392
|
14,850
|
|
Live weight marketed (lb)
|
176,985
|
94,365
|
103,685
|
95,220
|
155,232
|
8,702,100
|
|
Cultural energy/food energy
|
2.24
|
4.09
|
5.25
|
4.58
|
2.77
|
5.33
|
|
Mcal cultural energy/lb of live
weight
|
1.54
|
2.15
|
2.76
|
2.44
|
2.47
|
8.07
|
| 1 70% sold as choice fat lambs at 90 lb and 30% sold
as feed lambs at 75 lb |
| 2 All sold as good grass fat calves |
| 3 70% sold as choice grass fat calves |
| 4 Percent death loss was 2%, therefore 98% was marketed,
all sold as good grade grass fat steers weighing 801 lb. |
| 5 Percent death loss was 1%, therefore 99% was marketed,
70% sold as choice and 30% as good grade fed beef weighing an average
of 1,000 lb. |
There were 130,410 lb of choice lamb, which sold for 44 cents a pound,
totaling $57,380.00; 46,575 lb of feeder lamb, which sold for 42 cents
for a total gross income of $19,561.00; and 20,000 lb of wool, which brought
72 cents or a total of $14,400.00. Thus 84% of the sales came from lambs
and 16% from wool. Therefore 16% of the total Mcal of cultural energy
(16 X 271,705 Mcal) or 43,473 Mcal can be assessed to wool production.
The Mcal of cultural energy for shearing was calculated as follows: 184
man hours amounting to 460 Mcal, machinery totaling 4,259 Mcal, the transportation
of wool to market amounted to 14,400 Mcal, and finally the scouring using
3,600 Mcal. The total expenditure of cultural energy for shearing, handling,
and processing wool was 22,719 Mcal. Thus the addition of 43,473 Mcal
of cultural energy resulting from 16% of the general operational energy
costs and the 22,719 Mcal expended in actual shearing, transportation,
and scouring of the wool would be 66,192 Mcal for 8,000 lb of clean wool
or 8.27 Mcal/lb of scoured wool.
In a recent report
by the National Cotton Council of America it was estimated that cultural
energy consumed in a pound of cotton lint was 3.22 Mcal and the cultural
energy cost for noncellulosic and cellulosic synthetic fibers per pound
was 15.17 and 20.38 Mcal, respectively. The noncellulosic fiber included
polyester, nylon, and acrylic material, which are petro-chemicals or derived
from petroleum or natural gas.
Cotton has a significant
advantage in the amount of cultural energy required for fiber production
since the cotton plant not only produces fiber but also produces cotton
seed oil and cotton seed meal. Wool, like cotton, is a by-product or a
dual product of the sheep industry and requires considerably less cultural
energy than synthetic fibers.
Range
Cattle Production in the Intermountain Great Basin
The 250-head cattle
ranches that were analyzed in the Intermountain Great Basin area operate
somewhat similarly sheep ranches of the region. Typical cow-calf operations
throughout Utah, Nevada, and southern Idaho, like sheep operations, run
on desert ranges during the winter from about November 1 to April 1 and
are grazed on crested wheatgrass and/or native range during calving and
until about the third week in June, when they move to mountain ranges
until about October 1.
The supplement for cattle consisted of 30% alfalfa, 20% barley, and 50%
soybean meal. This was fed to cattle in pelleted form for 90 days at the
rate of 2 lb/day per animal. The supplement was hauled about 48 miles
from the feed mill to the range where it was fed.
The percent calf crop was 93% and all calves were Hereford X Angus crosses,
which sold at weaning time as good grade grass-fat calves weighing 405
lb. They dressed at 57.9% with the carcass containing 11.2% fat and 16.6%
protein that totaled 212,437 kcal.
The expenditure of cultural energy per pound of weaning weight was 2.15
Mcal; the ratio of cultural energy used per increment of food energy produced
in the dressed carcass was 4.09 (Table 2).
Range
Cattle Production in the Central Plains
In the central plains
states of Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma; northern New -Mexico, and eastern
Colorado, a typical cow-calf operation remains on the range all or most
of the year with only a few pounds of supplement fed during the winter
months. Calves are dropped in mid-April generally. Cows, during calving,
continue to receive a supplement until green growth starts on the ranges,
which occurs during early May. The cow-calf unit is grazed on rangelands
until about the middle of October, when the calves are weaned and sold.
In some cases forage sorghums are planted for summer grazing from about
July 15 until weaning time. This is referred to as a range-sorghum operation
for producing grass-fat weaner calves that sell as choice grade feeder
calves and weigh about 445 lb. For practical purposes the dressing percentage
and the percent fat and protein in the carcass were considered the same
as for the calves produced to choice grass-fat feeders in the Intermountain
Great Basin area discussed previously.
The ratio of cultural energy used to produce an increment of food energy
in meat was 5.25 for the cow-calf units that grazed range in conjunction
with forage sorghum pastures for fat weaner calf production and 4.58 for
the typical cow-calf range operation in the Central Plains region. The
range-sorghum grazing system expended 2.76 Mcal of cultural energy per
pound of weaner calf compared to 2.44 Mcal/lb of calf gain for the conventional
range cow-calf operation (Table 2). The development of the forage sorghum
pastures increased the expenditure of cultural energy because of the tillage
and plantings of these pastures.
In all cases winter supplement was fed to the breeding cow herd from about
the middle of December until about May 1 at the rate of 2 lb per head
per day. The supplement used in the calculations consisted of 60% alfalfa,
20% soybean meal, and 20% milo, which averaged 348 kcal of cultural energy
per pound of pelleted feed mixture.
The weaning weight from the range-sorghum grazing system produced calves
weighing 445 lb at weaning about October 15; the conventional range cow-calf
operation produced weaner calves weighing 414 lb. All of the weaner calves
in the range-sorghum feeding system were graded as choice grass fat feeder
calves, whereas only 70% of the calves produced solely from
range forage sold as choice.
Steer
Operations in the Central Plains
Many ranchers of the western range region have shifted from a cow-calf
operation to an enterprise of growing steers. These animals are purchased
as weaner calves and sold in the spring and summer as feeders. However,
more and more operators are fattening such steers on mountain summer ranges
of summer-fallowed forage sorghum pastures in the Central Great Plains
area. If properly managed, the steers can be sold from these systems weighing
over 800 lb at 17 to 18 months of age and grading as good for block meat.
Such meat is now marketed by many chain stores under various trade names.
Experiments in Colorado showed that these steers gained from 414 lb as
weaners to 810 lb when sold from the forage sorghum pastures in late summer.
These 800-lb steers dress at 58.0% with 20.1%, fat and 14.4% protein in
the carcass. Again it was calculated that fat contained 9.4 kcal/g and
protein contained 5.7 kcal/g.
In this study range steers were fed 3 lb of supplement per day from December
15 to May 15. The pelleted supplement contained 60% alfalfa, 20% soybean
meal, and 20% barley, which had a cultural energy cost of 348 kcal/lb.
From the 400-steer operation analyzed it was calculated that 2.77 kcal
of cultural energy were required for each kilocalorie of dressed meat
produced and 2.47 Mcal of cultural energy for each pound of steer gain
(Table 2).
Feedlot
Operations
A typical 15,000
feedlot capacity operation in the plains area near Denver, Colorado, was
analyzed in this study. The animals fed consisted of 62% steers and 38%
heifers. They were fed for 255 days, starting, with an average weight
of 414 lb and finishing at 1,000 lb. Thus the overall daily gain was 2.3
lb/day.
The ration the first 122 days was about 60% roughage consisting of corn
silage, chopped alfalfa, and beet pulp along with 40% dry rolled corn
and soybean meal. During the next 133 days the ration was about 65% concentrates,
consisting of dry rolled corn and soybean meal, along with 30% corn silage
and 5% molasses. All silage was raised near the feeding operation and
40% of the corn was raised on the owned land. The remainder of the feed
was hauled onto the farm feedlot from feed mills 15 miles away.
The average cultural energy for the ration during the first 122 days was
389 kcal of cultural energy per pound of feed and for the ration fed during
the next 133 days was 49 Kcal of cultural energy per pound of feed. The
average for the entire 255-day feeding period was 444 kcal/lb of feed
average daily intake per animal over the 255-day feeding period was 35
lb. During the early feeding period, daily consumption was 22 lb but was
as high as 39 lb during the latter part of the feeding period.
The heifers dressed at 60.5% and the steers dressed at 62.5%, which was
a weighted average of 61.7% for the 14,850 head marketed. Approximately
79% graded choice and 21% graded good.
It was calculated that an average 1,000-lb animal dressed at 62% with
a 4% shrink and the carcass containing 35% fat and 11.8% protein, which
yielded 1,108 Mcal of energy per dressed carcass. The dressed carcass
of the 414-lb weaner range calf had 220 Mcal; therefore the 255-day feeding
period produced 888 Mcal per carcass from the 586 pounds gained per animal.
With a 1% death loss the total Mcal from the dressed carcass was 13,186,800
for 14,850 animals marketed (Table 2).
Under a fattening program under confinement feeding, 5.33 kcal of cultural
energy were required to produce a kilocalorie of dressed carcass meat.
Each pound gained required 8.07 Mcal of cultural energy (Table 2). These
figures were considerably higher than those for a combination of range
and forage sorghum pastures, which were 2.77 and 2.47 Mcal of cultural
energy for a Mcal of meat and per pound of gain, respectively.
Complete
Systems from Conception to Marketing
The total expenditure
of cultural energy including the cow-calf and ewe-lamb operations until
animals reached various marketable weights and ages is shown in Table
3. Sheep are considerably more efficient than cattle. This result of multiple
births, faster growth rate, and ability to fatten to choice grade on range
forage without grain. An ewe produces almost 62% of her weight as weaner
lamb and a cow produces only about 45% of her weight as weaner calf in
the same period. The cow-calf unit can be most competitive with the ewe-lamb
unit in the production of red meat from forage by finishing steer calves
to good grade on sorghum pastures.
The expenditure of cultural energy to produce a choice grade beef from
conception to a 1,000-lb animal was of course the most inefficient in
the use of cultural energy because the use of harvested roughage and grain.
In the present study
it required 5.74 Meal of cultural energy to produce 1 lb of fattened choice
grade beef. Comparable figures showed that 4.54 Mcal per pound of beef
from birth to feedlot fattening was required. In the same study for use
of irrigated pastures along with feedlot finishing in Oklahoma. 11.6 Mcal
of cultural energy were required to produce a pound of finished beef.
| Table 3. Average production of live weight along with expenditure
of cultural energy per increment of energy produced and per pound
of live weight gain for various systems of producing marketabke kamb
and beef on an individual basis at the source of production. |
|
|
Lamb1 production
|
Weaner calf2 production
|
Steer3 production on forage
|
Feedlot fattening
|
|
Weight produced (lb)
|
85.5
|
414
|
810
|
1000
|
|
Energy in dressed carcass (Mcal)
|
58.6
|
220
|
527
|
1108
|
|
Cultural energy expended (Mcal)
|
131.3
|
1010
|
1987
|
5740
|
|
Cultural energy in/ energy out
|
2.24
|
4.58
|
3.47
|
5.18
|
|
Cultural energy in/ lb of live weight ( Mcal)
|
1.54
|
2.44
|
2.45
|
5.74
|
| 1 Ewes were white faced crosses weighing an average
of 139 lb. |
| 2 Cows were good grade Hereford cows weighing an average
of 914 lb. |
| 3 Calculated for an animal including the cow-calf
operation until finished either on forage or in the feedlot. |
Summary
The sheep industry
has the advantage of producing choice grade meat directly off the range
at a cost of only 2.24 kcal of cultural energy per kilocalorie of dressed
carcass compared to cattle which required approximately 4.5 kcal per kilocalorie
of dressed meat for weaner calves.
By using range along with forage-sorghum pastures, a good grade animal
that was raised from a calf to a steer weighing 810 lb can be produced
for an expenditure of about 3.5 kcal of cultural energy for each kilocalorie
of dressed carcass and a choice weaner calf weighing 445 lb can be produced
on range and forage sorghums for a cost of 5.25 kcal of cultural energy
per kilocalorie of dressed meat. By intensive management of a cow-calf
operation in the Intermountain Great Basin area, where crested wheatgrass
is used for early spring grazing and good mountain range is used from
June 15 to September 15, a kilocalorie of dressed choice weaner-calf meat
can be produced at a cost of 4.09 kcal of cultural energy.
Thus it appears that the lowest expenditure of cultural energy per kilocalorie
of table meat is from lamb anc from steers produced to good grade largely
from range and forage-sorghum pastures.
The expenditure of
cultural energy per pound of live weight gain of marketable animals was
only 1.54 kcal/lb of gain for a ewe-lamb operation and 2.15 kcal/lb of
gain for a cow-calf operation in the Intermountain Great Basin area, compared
to 2.76 and 2.44 kcal/lb of gain in the Central Great Plains where forage
sorghums are used for summer grazing and the conventional range operation
for weaner calf production, respectively.
The steer operation
that starts from birth and makes use of range and forage sorghums to a
weight of 810 lb required 2.45 kcal of cultural energy per pound of body
gain. Feedlot operations that start from birth and feed the weaner calf
for 255 days to a final weight of 1,000 lb required 5.74 kcal of cultural
energy per pound of live weight gain.
The relative cost
of cultural energy per pound of body gain under the various livestock
operations follows the same ranking as the kilocalories of cultural energy
expended per kilocalorie of dressed meat. A ewe-lamb operation is most
efficient, with a steer operation next. These are followed by the conventional
range cow-calf operation, the range-sorghum pasture grazing system, and
finally the feedlot fattening procedure.
|