Craster Parabolic Projections
|
| Figure 1. The Craster parabolic projection
in its
uninterrupted
form.
|
Along with the
Mollweide,
the Craster parabolic is the projection of choice for the aficionado
of
interrupted maps.
It is widely used to build both parallel
(Figure 2) and sinusoidal
interrupted maps
(Figure 3).
|
| Figure 2. A parallel
interrupted
version of the Craster parabolic projection.
|
The earliest form of what is now known as the Craster parabolic projection was
developed by John Evelyn Edmond Craster in 1929; it was refined into its modern
form by Charles H. Deetz and O.S. Adams in 1934. Also in 1934, another
geodetic scientist
named Reinholds V. Putnins independently introduced a new projection that he
called the P4. It turns out that the P4 was identical
to the Craster parabolic, and since Craster introduced his projection first,
he is typically given the credit for developing (and the right of naming) this
projection.
|
| Figure 3. A sinusoidal
interrupted
version of
the Craster parabolic projection.
|
- Distortions
- Shearing:
The Craster parabolic projection is not
conformal;
shapes are distorted more than they would be in a truly
conformal
projection. However, shapes are not distorted along either the
lines of tangency
(which run along the 36° 46' 0"N and 36° 46' 0"S
lines of latitude)
or along the map's
central meridian,
but shape distortion increases rapidly as you move away from these lines.
By interrupting the projection (which in effect places many more
central meridians
into the map), this shape distortion can be reduced dramatically. It is
this quality of Craster parabolic projections that make them so attractive
for use in
interrupted maps.
- Tearing:
Craster parabolic maps show
lines of latitude
as parallel straight lines and
lines of longitude
as nonparallel lines that become increasingly curved as you move farther
away from the map's
central meridian.
The edges of the map are highly curved
lines of longitude
180 degrees from the map's
central meridian.
Tearing occurs along these edges. As mentioned previously, the Craster
parabolic projection is extremely well suited to making both parallel
(Figure 2) and sinusoidal (Figure 3)
interrupted maps,
and it is at
least as common to see the Craster parabolic projection used to make
interrupted maps
as it is to see
uninterrupted
Craster parabolic maps.
- Compression:
Craster parabolic projections are
equivalent;
they do not suffer from
compression.
- Equivalence:
Craster parabolic projections are
equivalent;
they do not suffer from
compression.
- Conformality:
The Craster parabolic projection is not
conformal;
shapes are distorted more than they would be in a truly
conformal
projection. However, shapes are not distorted along either the
lines of tangency
(which run along the 36° 46' 0"N and 36° 46' 0"S
lines of latitude)
or along the map's
central meridian,
but shape distortion increases rapidly as you move away from these lines.
By interrupting the projection (which in effect places many more
central meridians
into the map), this shape distortion can be reduced dramatically. It is
this quality of Craster parabolic projections that make them so attractive
for use in
interrupted maps.
- Equidistance:
The Craster parabolic projection is not
equidistant;
there is no point or points from which all distances are shown
accurately.
- Azimuthality:
The Craster parabolic projection is not
azimuthal;
there is no point or points from which all directions are shown
accurately.
- Uses: The Craster parabolic projection is widely used to make
world maps; it is not very useful for mapping smaller areas. It is widely
used in atlases, in both its
interrupted
and
uninterrupted
forms. In this
capacity, perhaps its only competition is the
Mollweide projection, to which it is fairly
similar.