Site Map Comments

Biodisturbance and Unglaciated Unconfined Channels

picture of beetle-killed tree
Beetle-killed tree in
Rocky Mountain
National Park, CO

(Photo by G. David)

The effect of insects and wind on unglaciated unconfined channels depends on the elevation and aspect, therefore the expected influence of biodisturbance on unglaciated unconfined channels is split by vegetation.

Lower Ecotone and Lower Montane – – The potential increase in runoff from decreased amount of interception and transpiration from trees is more likely to affect smaller unglaciated unconfined channels. Smaller basins may have more trees killed by beetles than larger basins, causing an increase in the streamflow in these basins. In larger basins the effect will be minimal. Because unconfined channels are not as closely coupled with the surrounding hillslope, these channels will probably not experience an increase in wood load.

To learn more about the effects of wood on unglaciated confined channels click here.

Fire and Unglaciated Unconfined Channels

(Information compiled by G. David)

Picture of unglaciated unconfined channel
Poudre - Unglaciated
Unconfined Reach

(Photo by E. Wohl)

The expected response of unglaciated unconfined channels to fire depends largely on vegetation zones, fire severity and rainfall intensity. The unglaciated channels are found in the lower ecotone and lower montane portions of the Front Range. The lower ecotone is made up of ponderosa pine forests and shrubland and the lower montane consists of Douglas fir and ponderosa pine forests. Historically, the stands at these lower elevations were much more open woodlands. After a period of logging and burning in the 19th century and a wet period in the early 20th century, the stands are now denser and even-aged (Romme et al., 2003; Macdonald and Larsen, in press). Moody and Martin (2001) found that a basin is most at risk for post-fire erosion and flooding in the first two to three years after burning. Summer convective storms in the unglaciated segments of the Front Range may cause the greatest increases in runoff and erosion post-fire.

Historically, the lower ecotone had low to moderate severity fires. Higher severity fires are expected after years of fire suppression have led to denser stands of trees. Low to moderate severity fires do not significantly change the runoff pathways and erosional processes in a basin (Macdonald and Stednick, 2003). The high severity fires increase runoff from changes in soil properties and reduction of vegetation. Also, high severity fires increase erosion off hillslopes from dry ravel, rilling and channel incision.

Moody and Martin (2001) showed more sediment being shed from north-facing versus south-facing burned slopes. Intense convective storms are expected in the lower elevations, therefore a high severity fire followed by a few severe storms would lead to increased erosion on these slopes, particularly on north-facing slopes. The large storms coupled with a high severity burn area cause a greater amount of water and sediment to move through the basin. The unglaciated unconfined channels have larger floodplains where more sediment may be stored post-fire. The sediment may be stored over a large number of years in valley-fill and small alluvial fan deposits and persist through multiple fire cycles (Moody and Martin, 2001). Over the years the sediment may slowly be moved through the basin as vegetative re-growth ensues.

Increases in the peak flow, post-fire, may cause an increase in bank erosion and channel incision, especially in these unglaciated unconfined reaches where sediment shed from hillslopes may not reach the channel.


Click a link below to learn about the influence of hillslopes on each process domain:

Colluvial Hollows Ephemeral Channels Glaciated Confined Glaciated Partially Confined Glaciated Unconfined Unglaciated Confined Unglaciated Partially Confined Unglaciated Unconfined
Home Useful Links Biodisturbance in the Front Range Fire in the Front Range References Back to Top