Required Readings - Fall 2007
 

 

ALL ARTICLES AVAILABLE AS PDF FILES ON RAMCT

Week 2 (Aug. 29 & 30)

1.  Kingsland, S.E. 1991. Defining ecology as a science.  Pages 1-13 in Real, L.A. & J.H. Brown, editors. Foundations of Ecology-Classic Papers with Commentaries. Univ. of Chicago Press. Chicago.

2.  Lawton, JH.  1999.  Are there general laws in ecology?  Oikos 84: 177-192.

3.  Turchin, P.  2001.  Does population ecology have general laws?  Oikos 94: 17-26.

Week 3 (Sept. 5 & 6)

1.  Dingle, H. and Drake, V.A. 2007. What is migration? BioScience 57: 113-121

2.  Nathan, R. and Muller-Landau H.C.  2000.  Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. TREE 15: 278-285

 Week 4 (Sept. 12 & 13)

1.  Shea, K. and Kelly, D. 1998. Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand. Ecological Applications 8:824-832

2.  Heppell, S.S. 1998. Application of life-history and population model analysis to turtle conservation. Copeia 2:367-375

Week 5 (Sept. 19 & 20)

1.  Coomes, D.A. and Allen, R.B. 2007. Mortality and tree-size distributions in natural mixed-age forests. Journal of Ecology 95:27-40

2.  Clutton-Brock, T.H., Illus, A.W., Wilson, K., Grenfell, B.T., MacColl, A.D.C. and Albon, S.D. 1997. Stability and instability in ungulate populations: An empirical analysis. The American Naturalist 149:195-219

Week 6 (Sept. 26 & 27)

1.  Parker I.M. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. Ecological Applications 10:726-743

2.  Tobin P.C. 2007. Space-time patterns during the establishment of a nonindigenous species. Population Ecology 49:257-263

Week 7 (Oct. 2-4)

1. Hanski I. 2001. Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88:372-381

2. Fleishman E., Ray C., Sjogren-Gulve P., Boggs C.L., and Murphy D.D. 2002. Assesing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conservation Biology 16:706-716

 Week 8 (midterm)

Week 9 (Oct. 16-18)

1. Wiens J.A. 1977. On Competition and variable environments. American Scientist 65:590-597

2. Brewer S.J. 2003. Why don’t carnivorous pitcher plants compete with non-carnivorous plants for nutrients? Ecology 84:451-462.

 Week 10 (Oct. 23-25)

1. Crooks K.R. and Soulé M.E. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563-566

2. Navarrete S.A. and Berlow E.L. 2006. Variable interaction strengths stabilize marine community pattern Ecology Letters 9:526-536.

Week 11 (Oct. 30 & Nov. 1)

1. Knight T.M., McCoy M.W., Chase J.M., McCoy K.A. and Holt R.D. 2005. Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature 437:880-883.

2. Memmott J., Martinez N.D. and Cohen J.E. 2000. Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body size in natural food web. Journal of Animal Ecology 60:1-15.

Week 12 (Nov. 6-8)

1. Colden V. Baxter C.V., Fausch K.D., Murakami M. And Chapman P.L. 2004 fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 85:2656–2663

2. Hubbell S.P. 2006. Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology 87:1387–1398

Week 13 (Nov. 13-15)

1. Gleason H. A., 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53: 7–26.

2. Leibold M.A., Holyoak M., Mouquet N., Amarasekare P., Chase J.M., Hoopes M.F. et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7:601–613.

Week 14 (Nov. 27-29)

1. Holway D.A., and Suarez A.V. 2006. Homogenization of ant communities in Mediterranean California: the effects of urbanization and invasion. Biological Conservation 127:319-326.

2. Paine R.T., Tegner M.J. and Johnson E.A. 1998. Compounded Perturbations Yield Ecological Surprises. Ecosystems 1, no. 6: 535-45.

Week 15 (Dec. 4-6) 

 

Return to:

EY 600 Web Page

Colorado State University Home Page

Web Page for Dr. Kurt Fausch